Calc Percentage Css

In the above calculations, we forever thought-about the top/left nook of the graphic and the container with a view to use our logic both for pixel values or share values. This reference may be modified by including extra values to background-position. But then at a sure viewport width I desired to vary the width ratio between the columns. Doing that makes X% of the graphic width not calculate to the identical variety of pixels as X% of the component width. For a given width of the container field it's doable to seek out a share worth that makes the factors match, however as quickly because the viewport is resized the graphic shall be misaligned again. Color operations mostly take parameters within the identical models because the values they're changing, and percentages are dealt with as absolutes, so growing a 10% worth by 10% ends in 20%.

Calc Css Float To Procent Set the choice methodology parameter to relative for relative percentages. When applying relative percentages growing a 10% worth by 10% leads to 11%. Values are clamped to their allowed ranges; they don't wrap around. Where return values are shown, we have used codecs that make it clear what every operate has done, besides the hex variants that you're going to pretty much be be working with. For example, on phones, the place display real-estate is at a premium, browsers will oftentimes cover half or all the title and handle bar as soon as the consumer starts offevolved scrolling the page.

The tremendous viewport-percentage models are sized relative to this bigger everything-retracted space, so content material material employing these models will fill the complete seen web page when these UI parts are hidden. However, when these retractable parts are shown, they'll obscure content material material that is sized or positioned employing these units. Calc is a local CSS strategy to do basic math correct in CSS as a The most helpful capability of calc is its capability to combine models like percentages and pixels. If calc might subtract measured sizes of parts however that is impossible yet. Run calculations on them and use the brand new numbers to do designy things. By definition, ±∞ are outdoors the allowed vary for any property, and can clamp to the minimum/maximum worth allowed.

To use the exact font measurement the doc might be displayed in. However, the calc() operate offers a extra robust answer for 2 reasons. Specifically, we will combine relative models akin to percentages and viewport units, with absolute models akin to pixels. For example, we will create an expression that may subtract a pixel worth from a share value. The CSS3 calc() operate permits us to carry out mathematical operations on property values. Instead of declaring, for example, static pixel values for an element's width, we will use calc() to specify that the width be the results of the addition of two or extra numeric values.

Viewport models aren't solely amazing for giant parts like hero sections, however they may even be used to measurement parts like titles and have their font measurement modify immediately as a perform of the viewport size. This way, we will probably dodge having to set a number of breakpoints with set font sizes, which might simplify our fashion rules. Viewport models have been launched with the CSS Values and Units degree three spec. They enable to measurement parts and font sizes as a share of the full width or peak of the user's display . Creating a pleasant CSS structure begins with assigning sizes for all of the issues being positioned in an internet application.

One quite requested function has at all times been the power to specify sizes utilizing a mixture of sizing units. For example, it'd be good to have the power to order 50% of an region plus a hard and fast quantity of space, say 10px. Well you are ready to do this immediately utilizing the calc() property. You can use this function anyplace a measurement or wide variety is used, so that you should use it for positioning things, or in rgb() shade values as well, so it has a lot of extraordinary makes use of in a method sheet.

In this example, we're applying calc() to calculate the width of a component relative to its parent's width, after which subtract the quantity of margin we would like from that width. The worth of the margin is about in em units, which suggests that the quantity goes to be relative to the element's font size. As SVG 2 will get implemented, many properties that previously needed to be set immediately in your SVG factor might be settable as CSS properties — and plenty of of these properties take lengths, percentages, etc.

Thus, it is possible for you to to control extra of those options of your inline SVG with superior CSS functionalities akin to min, max, and clamp, in addition to calc and CSS variables. If you begin off with a browser window wider than one thousand pixels and make it narrower, the background image's columns align with the widths of the floated elements. But at 800px, 600px and 500px there are media question breakpoints at which the ratio of the column widths changes.

This causes the background picture to be misaligned within the primary set of columns. The math features (calc(), clamp(), sin(), and others outlined on this chapter) enable numeric CSS values to be written as mathematical expressions. Setting the peak of a component utilizing both the lh or the rlh models doesn't enable authors to regulate the precise variety of strains in that element. These models solely enable measurement calculations structured on the theoretical measurement of a super empty line; the dimensions of precise strains bins could differ structured on their content.

In circumstances the place an writer desires to restrict the variety of precise strains in an element, the max-lines property will be utilized instead. If the outcome after interpolation, addition, and accumulation is out-of-range for the goal context the worth is getting used in, it doesn't trigger the declaration to be invalid. Instead, the worth have to be clamped to the variety allowed within the goal context, the precise identical as math features (see § 10.12 Range Checking). To add performance to an internet page, JavaScript code is used. In this case, two functions, share 1() and share 2(), are declared and handed to the button by way of the onclick event. As a result, when the Calculate button is pressed, the result's displayed.

It returns the aspect with the required ID attribute and returns null if no parts with the required ID exist. Since viewport models are a share of the dimensions of the viewport, it will possibly look at first look that specifying sizes as share values could be equivalent. The big difference is that viewport models are constantly a share of the full measurement of the viewport, at the same time a share worth utilized on a component is a share of the element's parent, not essentially the complete viewport. To see what I mean, check out the CSS background-position and % demo document.

It incorporates two components that every has two floated youngsters to create columns. To create the phantasm of the columns being of equal peak a background graphic is used. When you employ pixels as a width value, the outcomes are very straightforward. Pixels are an absolute value, so one hundred pixels is one hundred pixels regardless of the place in your doc a component appears.

Unfortunately, at the identical time pixel values are straightforward to understand, they don't work nicely with responsive websites. An photograph normally has intrinsic values, so typically it will not have the identical measurement as its container, so background-position with share models may have an effect. Another very good point is the power to combine models with diverse measurements to get a ensuing size. For instance you possibly can set sizes relative to the present font measurement by mixing 'em' and 'px' units.

The calc() operate could be utilized to create a viewport-based grid out of the rem unit. We can do that by setting the basis element's font-size to be a fraction of the total viewport width. The working of calc() operate is best than pre-processor which may combine any types of units. The calc() operate makes uncomplicated calculations to specify the CSS property values. The most useful benefit of this operate is its means to combine units.

Now this isn't a gimme, however you'll very likely belif your instincts. If I set a div to be 50% of the width of its container, after which I need its left and suitable margins to fill the remainder of the space, I'd naturally set them to 25% every (so the odds add as much as 100%). For that to work, share margins have to be dependent on the size of the container.

One factor to notice is that there isn't a perform to calculate percentages. The mathematical method for percentages is that there's a worth being expressed because the fraction of a whole, then multiplied by 100. If you prefer to to calculate the share of a total, then you definitely simply have to try this similar factor in Excel. I've located that in follow the required behaviour is never what you actually need when employing perentages for background-position. In my expertise it's extra widely used to need to align some extent X% throughout a picture with some extent Y% throughout the element, the place X and Y are different.

It would be labored spherical by including a clear offset to the background photograph in order that its complete width matches the width of the factor it's utilized to. This means the purpose X% throughout the photograph will scale proportionally with the purpose X% throughout the box. In the image/container example, we used pixel values for the containing factor to level out how the responsive photograph would display.

In reality, the containing factor would even be set as a share and the image, or different elements, inside that container, would get their values founded mostly on a share of a percentage. If a picture is really 600 pixels wide, then employing a CSS worth to monitor it at 50% doesn't imply that it'll be 300 pixels vast within the net browser. This share worth is calculated founded mostly on the factor that incorporates that image, not the exact measurement of the photograph itself. If the container is one thousand pixels wide, then the photograph will monitor at 500 pixels since that worth is 50% of the container's width. If the containing factor is four hundred pixels wide, then the photograph will solely monitor at 200 pixels, since that worth is 50% of the container. The photograph in query right here has a 50% measurement which relies upon fully on the factor which incorporates it.

However, in absolute positioning, the beginning line and share of positioning are relative to padding box. Let's outline a solution to calculate share values elegant on pixel values, or vice versa (i.e. the formulation to transform between both). To do that we only should think about the reference points. For every set of root's youngsters which are numeric values with equivalent units, get rid of these youngsters and exchange them with a single numeric worth containing the sum of the eliminated nodes, and with the identical unit. The kind of a min(), max(), or clamp() expression is the results of including the kinds of its comma-separated calculations.

While general-purpose dimensions are outlined here, another modules outline further statistics varieties (e.g. [css-grid-1] introduces fr units) whose utilization is extra localized. The calc() expression represents the results of the mathematical calculation it contains, utilizing commonplace operator priority rules, which means that an expression is evaluated from the left to the right. Division or multiplication can be precede additions and expressions inside parentheses can be calculated first. The CSS3 calc carry out permits us to carry out mathematical operations on property values. Finally, of course, we will combine and match models of measure, as you've already seen.

Now you're doing a min of three values, certainly certainly one of which is absolute , certainly certainly one of which is decided by the dimensions of the factor that's your dad or mum (50%), and one which is completely decided elegant on window measurement . Many scholars of responsive website design have a challenging time applying percentages for width values. Specifically, there's confusion with how the browser calculates these percentages.

Below you will discover an in depth rationalization of how percentages work for width calculations in a responsive website. Below we're introduced with n excel workspace with some data, we're predicted to calculate the share change as indicated in column D. In this article, you will discover ways to make use of Excel to calculate share change, and in addition easy methods to define the rise and reduce in share values. Specified that UA-imposed minimal font sizes apply to the used font-size and never to decision of font-relative lengths. Where percentages should not resolved at computed-value time, they don't seem to be resolved in math functions, e.g.

The style of a hypot(), round(), mod(), or rem() expression is the results of including the kinds of its comma-separated calculations. Sub-expression, try and add the kinds of the left and precise arguments. If this returns failure, the complete calculation's style is failure. Otherwise, the sub-expression's style is the returned type.

Math features may even be helpful simply to precise values in a extra natural, readable fashion, relatively then as an obscure decimal. For example, the next units the font-size in order that precisely 35em matches inside the viewport, making certain that roughly the identical quantity of textual content usually fills the display regardless of the display size. Originally the viewport models have been outlined relative to the viewport measurement in general. The dynamism of browser chrome shifting out and in throughout the time of scrolling was invented later, and following Safari's lead, most UAs mapped these models to the bigger size. Defining it this manner is prettier in lots of cases, however additionally can block crucial content material in others. It's as a result not fully clear whether or not that is the very preferable mapping.

Percentage values are continually relative to a distinct quantity, as an instance a length. Each property that permits percentages additionally defines the amount to which the share refers. This amount generally is a worth of one different property for a similar element, the worth of a property for an ancestor element, a measurement of the formatting context (e.g., the width of a containing block), or some factor else. Today, I observed that the preliminary understanding of the share is absolutely not right, not a proportion of the father or mother elements, if the father or mother component is padding is different. There are a number of CSS attributes which will manage values as percentage.

But they use completely different different attributes as "reference value" for the calculation. For padding, this "reference value" is the width of the div. Usually, once we wish to calculate percentages and the denominator is 10 or 100, that's pretty easy and is usually calculated mentally. But at any time when the denominator seriously isn't an aspect of 100, it will get slightly trickier to do and not utilizing a little bit of help. So if a scholar scores thirteen out of 17 in a quiz, what % did they get on their quiz? It includes pushing the aspect to the middle of the viewport after which pulling it to come back utilizing a destructive margin of -50vw.

If the viewport was as a substitute 800px width and 1440px tall, we'd get the precise reverse result. Vmin and vmax may sound just a little trickier to understand, however it's all definitely effortless within the end. With vmin, we measurement as a share of the smallest between the width or the peak of the viewport, and with vmax, we measurement as a share of the most important between the two. In order to enable fluid typography, Mike Riethmeuller popularized a way that makes use of the calc() operate to set a minimal font size, most font size, and permit for scaling from the min to the max. The conversion is predicated on the default font-size of sixteen pixel, however may be changed. Further, you are going to discover ways to calculate the increment or decrement in a wide variety structured on the share values.

Layouts and sizes will change because the display size/device changes. If you consider this in physical, non-web terms, it's like having a cardboard field that you're filling with packing material. If you say that the field ought to be half stuffed with that material, the quantity of packing you would like will range counting on the dimensions of the box. The identical holds true for proportion widths in net design. When you employ percentages to ascertain a width for an element, the genuine measurement that component shows will range counting on the place it's within the document.

Percentages are a relative value, which means the dimensions displayed is relative to different parts in your document. Now, with this data you ought to be capable of work your self spherical proportion change calculations. Do you've gotten anyone in thoughts who may profit with the data captured here, do share the article with them. In this article, we're going to transfer via how you can use Excel to calculate proportion change, and in addition how you can define the rise and reduce in proportion values. For every little one of the basis node, serialize the calculation tree. If a results of this serialization begins with a "(" and ends with a ")" , dispose of these characters from the result.

Concatenate all the outcomes utilizing ", " , then append the finish end result to s. If a share is left at this point, it should in general block simplification of the node, because it should be resolved in opposition to one different worth utilizing information not presently available. The comparability capabilities of min(), max(), and clamp() examine a number of calculations and symbolize the worth of 1 of them.

How Many Hours Does A Normal Person Work A Week

I remember the days of making a decent wage working 40 hours per week and having a CHOICE to work more hours for overtime/time and a half. I've worked 100 hour weeks and after all the taxes Pennsylvania has…which includes county taxes, city taxes, ambulance tax…yes if you work in Pennsylvania you pay 'privilege' taxes. To top that off, these gas and oil companies now have a law working in their favor….they do NOT have to pay overtime/time and a half! It's a FEDERAL law made to suit them, certainly NOT the worker. These young people working all these hours think they are making "great money". There are more twist and turns to what these gas and oil companies are allowed to do concerning workers is unbelievable!

There USED to be a federal law saying how many hours a person could work per day….gone thanks to the gas and oil industry. As I already said, time and a half for hours worked over 40 hours…gone thanks to the gas and oil industry. Even the people making money off wells being on their property are being ripped off. The government have made 'laws' to where these gas and oil companies do NOT have to tell these people why they are now losing more and more money from the wells.

As the length of the workweek gradually declined, political agitation for shorter hours seems to have waned for the next two decades. However, immediately after the Civil War reductions in the length of the workweek reemerged as an important issue for organized labor. Roediger argues that many of the new ideas about shorter hours grew out of the abolitionists' critique of slavery — that long hours, like slavery, stunted aggregate demand in the economy. The hub of the newly launched movement was Boston and Grand Eight Hours Leagues sprang up around the country in 1865 and 1866.

The leaders of the movement called the meeting of the first national organization to unite workers of different trades, the National Labor Union, which met in Baltimore in 1867. The passage of the state laws did foment action by workers — especially in Chicago where parades, a general strike, rioting and martial law ensued. In only a few places did work hours fall after the passage of these laws. Many become disillusioned with the idea of using the government to promote shorter hours and by the late 1860s, efforts to push for a universal eight-hour day had been put on the back burner. The Netherlands' average workweek for full-time employees is 37.3 hours, the second-lowest among the most affluent OECD countries. With only 0.4% of employees working over 50 hours per week, the Dutch have some of the world's best work-life balance.

Residents reported that they spend about 15.9 hours per day eating, sleeping, and leisure. The average annual wages in the Netherlands are $54,262. Many countries regulate the work week by law, such as stipulating minimum daily rest periods, annual holidays, and a maximum number of working hours per week.

Working time may vary from person to person, often depending on economic conditions, location, culture, lifestyle choice, and the profitability of the individual's livelihood. For example, someone who is supporting children and paying a large mortgage might need to work more hours to meet basic costs of living than someone of the same earning power with lower housing costs. I've been a bedside registered nurse for the past 13 years in critical care. It really doesn't matter what type of bedside nursing you do because they are all draining in different ways.

Most nurses who are single work extra shifts in order to have something left so far as finances after living expenses. 36 hour weeks per week won't cut it, if you're not a trust fund baby. I've worked an average of 60 hours/wk most of those 13 years and can honestly say, I detest so much about so much. Most people on this forum can not even begin to imagine the pain that bedside nurses experience regularly. I used to be so positive, beautiful, energetic and alive. I have nothing to give myself or anyone else when I am not at work.

It seems every tasks outside of work takes monumental effort. I am mentally, physically, emotionally and psychologically exhausted to the degree I regular ask myself, "What are you doing with you life". Nurses and doctors are committing suicide left and right at alarming success rate. It's just not talked about in the mainstream media. It's a forbidden topic of discussion in the medical field it seems. Medical Insurance Company CEO's are ranking in millions annually w/ ungodly bonuses while we little people slave away trying to make a difference w/ scare resources and dehumanizing conditions.

Most patient and loved ones are great people and deserve the best care. They just can not fathom the impossible level of responsibility each bedside nurse has. Many people thank nurses are witches, but they're perspective is all wrong. In almost every case, if you've ever met a nurse you were sure was a witch, you can almost be certain that that nurse has been chronically abuse, dehumanized, bullied, etc. It's easy for nurses to go numb, becoming apathetic toward everyone and everyt% hing. It's a company within a company within a company full of shareholders whose names are not listed.

The top 1% of the 1% own more than the bottom 90% as a collective in the US. Even if the majority erased all of them, there will always be more sociopaths and malignant narcissists within the 90% majority to eventually destroy things all over again. Change will never happen so long as the majority remains uneducated on identifying and disarming sociopaths and narcissistic criminals.

Eastern European immigrants worked significantly longer than others, as did people in industries whose output varied considerably from season to season. High unionization and strike levels reduced hours to a small degree. The average female employee worked about six and a half fewer hours per week in 1919 than did the average male employee. In city-level comparisons, state maximum hours laws appear to have had little affect on average work hours, once the influences of other factors have been taken into account. One possibility is that these laws were passed only after economic forces lowered the length of the workweek.

Overall, in cities where wages were one percent higher, hours were about -0.13 to -0.05 percent lower. Again, this suggests that during the era of declining hours, workers were willing to use higher wages to "buy" shorter hours. The long-term decline in the length of the workweek, in this view, has primarily been due to increased economic productivity, which has yielded higher wages for workers. Workers responded to this rise in potential income by "buying" more leisure time, as well as by buying more goods and services.

In a recent survey, a sizeable majority of economic historians agreed with this view. Over eighty percent accepted the proposition that "the reduction in the length of the workweek in American manufacturing before the Great Depression was primarily due to economic growth and the increased wages it brought" . Other broad forces probably played only a secondary role. For example, roughly two-thirds of economic historians surveyed rejected the proposition that the efforts of labor unions were the primary cause of the drop in work hours before the Great Depression. The national standard for full-time employees is a 40-hour workweek, which employers typically divide into five eight-hour workdays.

Many of these employees may also have an option of overtime, during which employees work longer hours for more pay. While 40 hours is the standard and is close to the average number of hours people typically work in a week, some people work in jobs with higher or lower average hours expected of them. I live in Ireland, annual leave is 20 working days per year and 9 public holidays. Employers are always finding new and innovative ways to get around employment rights for employees.

Only for EU directives we would be on a lot less annual leave and fewer employment rights. If anything we follow the American model more than the rest of Europe model. Some industries – law, tech etc pay ok but people don't get their full annual leave and if it's not used by the deadline, they lose it. Employees in the pharma industries are contracted to work 11 month but their contracts are renewed or not before the full 12 months so the employers can avoid employment rights. The pilots who work for Ryanair are better paid than their counterparts but are self employed, they have to set themselves up as companies and get paid through a recruitment company to work for themselves. The HMRC in the UK are looking into Ryanair's work practices not the Irish government.

There are tons of legal loop holes in Irish employment laws and the government doesn't care one bit. Hong Kong has no legislation regarding maximum and normal working hours. The average weekly working hours of full-time employees in Hong Kong is 49 hours. In Hong Kong, 70% of surveyed do not receive any overtime remuneration. These show that people in Hong Kong concerns the working time issues.

As Hong Kong implemented the minimum wage law in May 2011, the Chief Executive, Donald Tsang, of the Special Administrative Region pledged that the government will standardize working hours in Hong Kong. Whether you have a full-time job, a part-time job or multiple jobs can also impact your average hours worked. Many full-time jobs have standard work hours that ensure all employees in a company work for similar periods. Part-time jobs typically provide under 40 hours of work each week, which lowers the weekly average for an employee.

If you have multiple part-time jobs or a full-time and a part-time job, you can easily work more than the standard 40-hour workweek and increase your average weekly hours. The swift reduction of the workweek in the period around World War I has been extensively analyzed by Whaples . His findings support the consensus that economic growth was the key to reduced work hours. He finds that the rapid economic expansion of the World War I period, which pushed up real wages by more than 18 percent between 1914 and 1919, explains about half of the drop in the length of the workweek.

The reduction of immigration during the war was important, as it deprived employers of a group of workers who were willing to put in long hours, explaining about one-fifth of the hours decline. The rapid electrification of manufacturing seems also to have played an important role in reducing the workweek. Increased unionization explains about one-seventh of the reduction, and federal and state legislation and policies that mandated reduced workweeks also had a noticeable role. Because of changing definitions and data sources there does not exist a consistent series of workweek estimates covering the entire twentieth century.

Table 2 presents six sets of estimates of weekly hours. Despite differences among the series, there is a fairly consistent pattern, with weekly hours falling considerably during the first third of the century and much more slowly thereafter. In particular, hours fell strongly during the years surrounding World War I, so that by 1919 the eight-hour day had been won. Hours fell sharply at the beginning of the Great Depression, especially in manufacturing, then rebounded somewhat and peaked during World War II. After World War II, the length of the workweek stabilized around forty hours. Owen's nonstudent-male series shows little trend after World War II, but the other series show a slow, but steady, decline in the length of the average workweek. Greis's two series are based on the average length of the workyear and adjust for paid vacations, holidays and other time-off.

The last column is based on information reported by individuals in the decennial censuses and in the Current Population Survey of 1988. It may be the most accurate and representative series, as it is based entirely on the responses of individuals rather than employers. Generally, business sector agrees that it is important to achieve work–life balance, but does not support a legislation to regulate working hours limit. They believe "standard working hours" is not the best way to achieve work–life balance and the root cause of the long working hours in Hong Kong is due to insufficient labor supply. A new cadre of social scientists began to offer evidence that long hours produced health-threatening, productivity-reducing fatigue. This line of reasoning, advanced in the court brief of Louis Brandeis and Josephine Goldmark, was crucial in the Supreme Court's decision to support state regulation of women's hours in Muller vs. Oregon.

Goldmark's book, Fatigue and Efficiency was a landmark. In addition, data relating to hours and output among British and American war workers during World War I helped convince some that long hours could be counterproductive. Businessmen, however, frequently attacked the shorter hours movement as merely a ploy to raise wages, since workers were generally willing to work overtime at higher wage rates. The average workweek in Iceland is 43.3 hours for full-time employees. The percentage of employees who work over 50 hours per week is very high, at 15.1%. In the United States, the average workweek for full-time employees is 41.5 hours.

The U.S. has a high percentage of employees who work over 50 hours per week at 11.1%. The average annual wages in the United States are $63,093. The average workweek for full-time employees in Portugal is 40.7 hours.

The percentage of employees who worked over 50 hours per week is a little high at 8.3%. The average annual wages in Portugal are $25,487. To determine how long the average workweek is around the world, 24/7 Wall St. analyzed data on the average hours usually worked among dependent employees in 2018 from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Data on the percentage of dependent employees who work part-time -- less than 30 hours a week -- also came from the OECD and is for 2018. Additional data listed is all from the OECD and is for the most recent period available. All figures are annual except for unemployment figures, which are quarterly. All data on employee hours and part-time work are for dependent employees, meaning it does not include self-employed workers. However, barely four in 10 full-time workers in the U.S. indicate they work precisely this much. The hefty proportion who tell Gallup they typically log more than 40 hours each week push the average number of hours worked up to 47.

Only 8% of full-time employees claim to work less than 40 hours. The movement for shorter hours as a depression-fighting work-sharing measure built such a seemingly irresistible momentum that by 1933 observers predicting that the "30-hour week was within a month of becoming federal law" . The bill was sponsored in the House by William Connery. Instead, FDR backed the National Industrial Recovery Act .

Hunnicutt argues that an implicit deal was struck in the NIRA. Labor leaders were persuaded by NIRA Section 7a's provisions — which guaranteed union organization and collective bargaining — to support the NIRA rather than the Black-Connery Thirty-Hour Bill. Business, with the threat of thirty hours hanging over its head, fell raggedly into line.

Despite a plan by NRA Administrator Hugh Johnson to make blanket provisions for a thirty-five hour workweek in all industry codes, by late August 1933, the momentum toward the thirty-hour week had dissipated. About half of employees covered by NRA codes had their hours set at forty per week and nearly 40 percent had workweeks longer than forty hours. The banner years for maximum hours legislation were right around 1910. This may have been partly a reaction to the Supreme Court's ruling upholding female-hours legislation in the Muller vs. Oregon case . The Court's rulings were not always completely consistent during this period, however. In 1898 the Court upheld a maximum eight-hour day for workmen in the hazardous industries of mining and smelting in Utah in Holden vs. Hardy.

In Lochner vs. New York , it rejected as unconstitutional New York's ten-hour day for bakers, which was also adopted out of concerns for safety. Several state courts, on the other hand, supported laws regulating the hours of men in only marginally hazardous work. By 1917, in Bunting vs. Oregon, the Supreme Court seemingly overturned the logic of the Lochner decision, supporting a state law that required overtime payment for all men working long hours. Men were allowed freedom of contract unless it could be proven that regulating their hours served a higher good for the population at large. Mexico's average workweek for full-time employees is 48.5 hours. A massive 28.7% of employees work over 50 hours per week.

The average workweek for full-time employees in Poland is 40.9 hours. About 6.0% of employees work over 50 hours per week. The average workweek for full-time employees in Switzerland is 40.5 hours.